Nowy numer YARSa Vol. 2012 5(6) jest dostępny on-line

Szymon Syp
Dodane przez Szymon Syp Wrzesień 12, 2012 13:41

Nowy numer YARSa Vol. 2012 5(6) jest dostępny on-line

Na stronie YARS – Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies są ukazały się wszystkie artykuły z numeru YARS Vol. 2012 5(6).

Małgorzata Król-Bogomilska,, Standards of Entrepreneur Rights in Competition Proceedings – a Matter of Administrative or Criminal Law?
Anna Błachnio-Parzych, The Nature of Responsibility of an Undertaking in Antitrust Proceedings and the Concept of ‘Criminal Charge’ in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights
Aleksander Stawicki, Competence of Common Courts in Poland in Competition Matters
Rafał Stankiewicz, The Scope of Application of the Provisions of the Administrative Procedure Code in Competition Enforcement Proceedings
Maciej Bernatt, Can the Right To Be Heard Be Respected without Access to Information about the Proceedings? Deficiencies of National Competition Procedure
Przemysław Kamil Rosiak, The ne bis in idem Principle in Proceedings Related to Anti-Competitive Agreements in EU Competition Law
Mateusz Błachucki, Sonia Jóźwiak, Exchange of Information and Evidence between Competition Authorities and Entrepreneurs’ Rights
Inga Kawka, Rights of an Undertaking in Proceedings Regarding Commitment Decisions under Article 9 of Regulation No. 1/2003
Bartosz Turno, Agata Zawłocka-Turno, Legal Professional Privilege and the Privilege Against Self-Incrimination in EU Competition Law after the Lisbon Treaty – Is It Time for a Substantial Change?
Krystyna Kowalik-Bańczyk, Procedural Autonomy of Member States and the EU Rights of Defence in Antitrust Proceedings
Mariusz Baran, Adam Doniec, EU Courts’ Jurisdiction over and Review of Decisions Imposing Fines in EU Competition Law
Jan Szczodrowski, Standard of Judicial Review of Merger Decisions Concerning Oligopolistic Markets

Concurrence of wills – a necessary ingredient of an agreement restricting competition.
Case comment to the judgment of Court of Competition and Consumer Protection of 8 February 2011 – ZST Gamrat S.A. v President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (Ref. No. XVII Ama 16/10)
Commented by Monika A. Górska
The EMPiK and Merlin concentration prohibition: Would the European Commission reach a similar verdict?
Case comment to the decision of the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection of 3 February 2011 – Merlin.pl S.A. and NFI EMPiK Media & Fashion S.A (DKK-12/2011)
Commented by Mateusz Radomyski
Maciej Bernatt Sprawiedliwość proceduralna w postępowaniu przed organem ochrony konkurencji [Procedural fairness in the proceedings before the competition authority], Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania, Warszawa 2011, 373 p.
Reviewed by Marek Krzysztof Kolasiński

Szymon Syp
Dodane przez Szymon Syp Wrzesień 12, 2012 13:41
Napisz komentarz

Brak komentarzy

Co o tym myślisz?

Bądź pierwszą osobą która doda komentarz do artykułu.

Napisz komentarz
Zobacz komentarze

Napisz komentarz

Twój adres e-mail nie zostanie opublikowany.
Wymagane pola oznaczone są*

Wydarzenia

No events found